FEEDBACK
POLICY
We encourage
your feedback. If you'd like to respond to something in SC Statehouse
Report, please send us an e-mail. We reserve the right to edit
for length and clarity. One submission allowed per month. Submission of
a comment grants permission to us to reprint. Please keep your comment
to 250 words or less:
feedback@statehousereport.com
OTHER
FEEDBACK
|
FEEDBACK
12/23:
Need more than troopers to save lives on road
To the editor:
The traffic fatality situation only partially comes
about because of too few troopers on the road. DPS is overloaded
with civilian personal, paperwork and to many specialized jobs.
On top of that with the troop concept troopers take more time going
to and from court and are patrolling much less and are not near
as effective if stationed in individual counties.
Troopers are losing their identities and respect of
the public because they don't have that personal contact that living
in and mingling within a county provides. The public only sees them
at critical times and in most cases people having to wait for hours
for them to respond creates problems. The Courtesy may still be
there but the efficiency and service simply is not.!
-- James Fleming Jr., Bennettsville, S.C.
12/16:
You are wrong on taxation
To the editor:
Regarding your contention that I dont pay too
much in taxes compared to other states, I think you are wrong. I
dont dispute that real property tax on my owner-occupied home
is close to that our neighboring states, but we are still higher.
And there is no disputing that our state income tax rate is higher
than North Carolina and Georgia. I do agree that our sales taxes
are a bit lower than our neighbors.
But you are dead wrong when you factor in personal property. I
have lived in both North Carolina and Georgia, our immediate neighbors,
in the last five years. An automobile (that I still own) was taxed
in Fulton County Georgia (one of the highest property tax areas
of Georgia) at $80 a year when I left. The same automobile two years
earlier in Forsyth County North Carolina was taxed at about $160.
Today that car is 11 years old, has 148,000 miles on it, and Lexington
County South Carolina taxes it at $280 a year. I own three cars
and my total property tax bite on them is more than $2,000 a year.
When you throw in personal property tax, which is often ignored,
we take a lot bigger hit here in South Carolina than many people
are willing to admit.
And by the way, I have owned similar homes in all three states
in terms of value. The property taxes in North Carolina were definitely
lower (and I was paying municipal taxes too). Georgia was about
the same as my home here in Lexington, but since I bought my home
in 2001 my property taxes have marched up 20%. That never happened
anywhere else I lived.
You can make numbers say anything you want, but I have experience
to make my comparison by. South Carolina over-taxes its citizens
and to compound matters, we waste a lot it. It is time to stop talking
about where new money for government is going to come from and time
to start talking about how we are spending the money we have.
-- Michael E. Dey, Director of Government Affairs, South Carolina
Association of REALTORS®
12/8: Good tax
article
To the editor:
I thought your editorial (Dec.
7) about the fairness of SC's current tax system was good and
well thought out. There is another point that I have not seen mentioned
in anywhere, even though it should be an important consideration.
That is the role of federal taxes in the make-up.
If we start with the assumption that the people of the state pay
the taxes (yes, I know that tourists pay some portion, but by and
large, taxes are paid by the residents of SC), then it makes sense
to structure the tax system where whenever possible, the state taxes
are deductible items when computing federal taxes.
I think the only state taxes that are deductible for
federal purposes are income and property taxes. For every $100 in
taxes the state needs, if the residents pay in the form of sales
tax or some other form of use tax, then the after-tax cost to the
resident is $100. If the state collects the same $100 in income
tax, then the resident gets a benefit of $100 x the marginal federal
tax rate. Many people have marginal federal rates in excess of 25%,
so the after tax cost in my example is under $75. This means that
far more capital stays in South Carolina.
With income or property taxes, the federal government
is essentially contributing 15-35%, depending on the payer's tax
bracket. Under a system where the state relies on sales tax, the
federal government contributes nothing. This is one more reason
why it is not smart to replace part of the income tax with sales
or other use taxes.
-- David Pardue, Hilton Head Island, S.C.
11/7: Accountability
is why superintendent should change
To the editor:
You missed the main point of why the head of the Dept.
of Education should report to the Governor instead of the General
Assembly (11/2
column). It's called Accountability. How can anyone be held
accountable for their actions when they are accountable to so many
people. By this method, you increase rather than decrease the politics
of education. Right now Ms. Tennenbaum (sic) and those before her
report to everyone and no one. Is that not a recipe for arrogance
and single mindedness. Perhaps this is why we have a Dept. of Education
that is overloaded with Bureaucrats and why so many educational
decisions
are made in Columbia and not in the Counties. Is this also the reason
that the Charter School movement, while exploding in other states,
is being thwarted here.
There is a lot more to the story that you are either being told
or understand. In the future, do a little more research. Remember,
over 60% of the state budget is for education. Is this not too much
power entrusted in ONE individual?
-- Tom Hatfield, Hilton Head Island
11/2: Some appointments
OK
To the editor:
I believe some appointments may be OK but others should
be by the voters, for example: I would state that most magistrates
have not been reappointed since their initial
appointment. Some Senators like to carry their appointments in their
"hip pocket", where at the drop of a pin, he can remove
that magistrate whenever he wants another one. That
process was in affect in Cherokee County in the early l990's and
Senator Harvey S. Peeler, Jr., was successful in having a "rider"
included in the budget that deleted any funds for Veterans Affairs
Office as long as I was VA Officer
-- Boyd McLean, Gaffney, S.C.
|