FEEDBACK
POLICY
We encourage
your feedback. If you'd like to respond to something in SC Statehouse
Report, please send us an e-mail. We reserve the right to edit
for length and clarity. One submission allowed per month. Submission of
a comment grants permission to us to reprint. Please keep your comment
to 250 words or less:
feedback@statehousereport.com
OTHER
FEEDBACK
|
FEEDBACK
6/25: Corporations
could do a better job than government
No one would argue that the confidence in Corporate America has
been damaged by the greed of the four Corps you mentioned in your
latest article. This does not mean that all Corps are bad. Most
of them play by the rules. Due to Mass Media we are bombarded by
the scandals of few and then lump them into a general group to which
we place all the blame for the ills of society.
I believe that many of these Corporations could do a better job
of providing services than the State and Federal Government. You
mentioned that roads should be built by the State. I could not disagree
more. These road contracts should be put out for bid and the lowest
and or most qualified company should be hired to get the job done
to the specifications required by law.
I know I am not the only person who has seen several state workers
on the side of the road leaning on a shovel while one man is doing
all the work. That is a waste of man power that a private sector
company will not tolerate because it has to be efficient and wise
with it's own money in order to turn a profit.
-- Jay Auld, Bluffton, SC
6/23: Magistrates
should be decided at polls
Your article on actions within the Statehouse are really good.
I certainly think in some instances Governor Sanford has done an
outstanding job this year, especially in watching and looking after
what monies we have. Probably the most offending and needless legislation
(other than for personal reasons) are the many "appointments"
by our senators. Certainly it may not reduce our budget, but it
would prove to our citizens that justice must not be in the hands
of our senators.
The appointment system for our magistrates should be dissolved
and require the election process for all judicial functions. For
example, in the present systems, magistrate are appointment by our
senators and greater percentage are never reappointed. In other
words the senators are carrying around in the appointments in their
"hip pocket." How can we ever expect our citizens to believe
in our judicial system when our magistrates must fear their termination
at the whims of the senators? For example, years past I had a rider
included in the budget that terminated all monies in the Cherokee
County Veterans budget, just to force me out as Veterans Affairs
Officer. After about two years of protesting by our veterans, our
Senator Harvey S. Peeler, Jr., consented to allow for our veterans
to have an advisory election and I ran and was selected by the veterans
on two different times and retired when I wanted to not when Senator
Harvey S. Peeler, Jr., forced me out. Now our veterans only select
our Veterans Affairs Officer and our Legislative Delegation has
accepted this procedure each and every election. Such an important
office as Magistrate should be decided at the polls.
-- Boyd McLean, Gaffney, S.C.
6/22: Says governor's
agenda isn't to privatize
You are inferring [see
6/22] to the readers that the governor has a hidden agenda
and it is to privatize a significant amount of government. While
that may be some truth, it is not the absolute truth. Enron and
the likes was well managed but the profits went in the managers'
pockets. Research these firms again and you will not find a significant
amount of waste; it was fraud that took the company down. By the
same token, it is not fraud that has the state's economy in a crisis;
it's wasteful spending and mismanagement or no management. The governor
is on the right track I do believe and supports his agenda. Government
is too big and needs to be purged ASAP! Duplication of programs
and services,overpaid managers and staff must be addressed now.
Go back and read or listen to the governor's address, he promised
to introduce no new programs and to get a handle on the budget.
In my opinion,he has been true to his words. I am a independent
conservative rookie member of AARP and I support the good faith
efforts of Mr.Sanford thus far. I have no faith in straight party
voting. He hasn't disappointed me yet. I pray to God that he continue
to look out for the common person. Faith,hope and love.
-- Charles E. Lott Sr., Union, S.C.
6/4:
Defends Sanford
As a Republican (see 5/25 Feedback below)
, if you are man or woman enough to say these things about Governor
Sanford than you should be man or woman enough to sign your name.
Governor Sanford has set aside time each
month to let the people of South Carolina talk to him. So get your
name on his schedule and be man or woman enough to look him face
to face and tell him what you don't like about what is going on
in SC.
-- Ron Hernly, North Charleston, S.C.
6/2:
Fully fund education
We need to fully fund education for the students
of South Carolina. We've been working too hard to improve education
and we can't go backwards now. The children deserve an education
and our elected officials were charged with doing the right thing
for children. Forget about the politics and get on with educating
the children."
-- Carol Tempel, James Island
6/2:
People are losing with GOP
The Republicans always show their true colors
on all levels of elected government. If it doesn't benefit business
we ain't for it. It is, of course, short-sighted because an undereducated
public hurts business in the long run on so many levels; poorly-trained
labor pools, consumers earning less money so people don't buy the
goods and services from
businesses, etc.
On the Federal level, a tax cut that deprives
the working poor, including military families of an added tax break
for children was just unconscionable, but predictable. When a Republican
legislator weighs whether to help the truly needy with tax relief,
or help business avoid
more tax obligations, the poor always lose.
-- Alan Patterson, San Diego, Calif.
|