| 
  HOT ISSUE
 Next year's budget 
              will be tougher than everBy 
              Andy Brack
 SC Statehouse Report
 
               
                |  |  | FEEDBACK 
                    POLICY We encourage 
                    your feedback. If you'd like to respond to something in SC 
                    Statehouse Report, please send us an e-mail. We reserve 
                    the right to edit for length and clarity. One submission allowed 
                    per month. Please keep your comment to 250 words or less: 
                    
 |  SEPT. 21, 2003 - South Carolina is waiting for the skinny lady 
              to sing about good times. After seven mid-year budget cuts over the last three years, state 
              government is no longer a fat lady. Government has been cut to the 
              bone, many would argue. "For any agency function funded by state dollars, there is 
              no fat left," said state Sen. John Land, D-Clarendon. "You've 
              crippled these state agencies."  When lawmakers return in January, they'll find an even tougher 
              job than this past session, which roundly was considered the most 
              difficult ever because of budget shortfalls in the down economy. 
              In January, lawmakers will probably have to start cutting mandated 
              programs if they don't come up with other solutions. Lawmakers and budget writers say the legislature could be $500 
              million in the hole before they even get started on next year's 
              budget. First, state forecasters predict no growth in state revenues. In 
              flush years of the past, new dollars from growth from good times 
              funded new programs, improved services and allowed budget writers 
              to adjust for inflation without feeling pain. That's not going to 
              be there next year. Next, the state is carrying a $155 million deficit from the last 
              couple of years. Finally, the current budget includes about $270 million in funding 
              for education, Medicaid and other programs from one-time money sources. 
              That means if education and Medicaid health service levels are to 
              remain the same, the state has to come up with a pool of new money. 
             With just those few items, we're already up to being $425 million 
              behind. And that doesn't take into account the millions needed to 
              fully fund education, deal with the increasing prison population, 
              add people to the Medicaid rolls and more. But because next year is an election year, there will be incredible 
              pressure to keep from raising taxes. And that, in turn, may mean 
              that state government is slashed even more.  "I think you're going to hear a lot of crying and wailing," 
              Land said. "There is no free lunch out there." State Sen. Jim Ritchie, R-Spartanburg, worries it's too early still 
              to speculate about what's going to happen next year because the 
              state has never faced the fiscal crisis it's in. There's not a model 
              to project what will happen, he said. With proposals beginning to get to the table on the restructuring 
              of Medicaid, overall government restructuring and revamping the 
              state's tax structure, there may be a way out of the mess, he said. If there's not a way out - - and you shouldn't expect it - - lawmakers 
              will either cut agency budgets, raise revenues or both. (A word 
              to the wise: look for the "both" option.) Among the taxes and fees that will be considered: 
              Sales tax exemptions. South Carolina currently loses 
                more than $1 billion in tax revenues every year because it exempts 
                more than 60 items - everything from sales taxes on phone bills 
                and electricity to sales taxes on newspapers and livestock.
 
Cigarette tax increases. Last year, a proposal to raise 
                the per-pack cigarette tax to the national average failed. Because 
                it could bring in $180 million, look for it to return.
 
Sales tax increases. Democrats and some Republicans proposed 
                various limited sales tax increases. Raising it by two cents would 
                net about $1 billion.
 
Property tax relief. There also are complicated plans 
                to provide property tax relief while boosting and sales taxes 
                and cutting exemptions. If any such proposal passed, the state 
                would get millions in return.
 
Fines and fees. This year, traffic fines went up slightly 
                and state parks started charging more fees. In the coming year, 
                more fines, user fees, surcharges and extras will start to allow 
                agencies to develop alternative revenue streams. One thing is for sure: the coming legislative session is going 
              to be incredibly different. It will be where the rubber of political 
              philosophy meets the road of reality. For Republicans, it could 
              be a Perfect Storm that whips the state into cutting government 
              more to pump a philosophy of smaller government. For Democrats, 
              the economic pressures may be so great that their GOP peers do the 
              unexpected - - raise taxes.  McLEMORE'S WORLD Going postal
 This week's cartoon by our Bill McLemore:  
  FEEDBACK
 9/7: 
              On taxes and voters To the editor:  I doubt that any tax increases in Alabama will open 
              the door to the same in South Carolina. The majority party that 
              controls Columbia is too backward to be led by the likes of Alabama 
              politicians or voters. Next year is an election year and politicians 
              (of all stripes) are unlikely to raise taxes when they have to face 
              the voters. The state's majority party is infected with the fatal 
              Newt Gingrich malady that would rather let government close down 
              or fail than be labeled "tax raiser." This is why we have 
              an uncovered budget deficit from past years that gets covered up 
              regularly like the pea under three walnut shells in a con game. 
              And if put to a vote of the people (as in Alabama) well...nice try.
 -- Francis X. Archibald, Hanahan, S.C.
 
 9/7: On taxes and leadership
 To the editor: It doesn't take leadership to raise taxes. But, it 
              does take leadership to reduce the size of government, offer quality 
              services, with no tax increases.  -- Becky Fagg, chair, We The People of Lexington 
              County, Lexington, S.C. ### |